http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3488
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-08 21:18 ------- Subject: Re: Bayes SQL and Bayes DBM differ on newest_token_age for same corpus. On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:07:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-08 21:07 ------- > really? do you have that message? can you attach it here? no one has been > able to show me a > message which is found to be in the future. Well, if my guess is right, everyone has it. See compile_now. > what exactly is the issue for DBM? > Red Herring I think. Not totally sure why DBM doesn't show the problem. The test msg from compile_now is causing several tokens to get added/touched in the SQL database. They don't appear to get touched in the DBM database. Not sure why. The corpus I'm using is several months old, so with this really recent set of tokens in the DB it makes calculate_expire_delta give back wonky results. Michael ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
