On Monday, June 14, 2004, 2:45:03 PM, Justin Mason wrote: > one thing though -- any chance you could make the returned msg a little > more machine-readable? ie. instead of
> Blocked, areyoureallysatisfied.biz on sc, ws lists, See: > http://www.surbl.org/lists.html > something like: > Blocked, areyoureallysatisfied.biz, on lists [sc][ws], See: > http://www.surbl.org/lists.html > That way, we could use "\[sc\]" as a regexp to match that. Otherwise, it's > not quite as easy to pick out from the "human-readable" part of the > string, and possibly even might misfire -- for example if in future > someone set up an "on" blocklist. ;) Thanks for the feedback!. I've made the change: citi-protection.info 600 IN A 127.0.0.14 600 IN TXT "Blocked, citi-protection.info on lists [sc][ws][ph], See: http://www.surbl.org/lists.html"; citibank-validate.info 21600 IN A 127.0.0.12 21600 IN TXT "Blocked, citibank-validate.info on lists [ws][ph], See: http://www.surbl.org/lists.html"; citicorp-verification.com 21600 IN A 127.0.0.12 21600 IN TXT "Blocked, citicorp-verification.com on lists [ws][ph], See: http://www.surbl.org/lists.html"; However If possible I may prefer that folks process on the A record instead of the TXT record. To me the A record is the more machine-relevant part. Others, including the early proponents of using TXT for signalling to machines, may disagree. Also this makes the human-readable part somewhat less pretty IMNSHO. :-) Jeff C.
