On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 10:29:30AM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> So, the first tarball got pushed out and not the second?

yeah.

> I suggest we roll a pre4 release and allow people to submit mass-check
> logs with either pre3 or pre4 (recommending pre4).

It doesn't matter to me really as far as mass-checks go, I don't think
there's anything that wasn't included that will affect the results.

a pre4 may be good for testing purposes though.

So I'm +0.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventually 'invent' Unix.
  no chance.  they only have a finite number of monkeys." - Thomas Lakofski

Attachment: pgp34crCkFBqB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to