http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3331
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-09 13:07 ------- Subject: Re: [review] Bayes option to keep original token as db data (not key). On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:32:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just to make it clear what I'm thinking, I won't limit the token size > until after the SHA1 hash has been computed. So there might be a > largish token whose SHA1 hash will match exactly the original size but > the data stored in the database will be shorted to 128 or 200 > characters. Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. The plaintext token is meant to be informational at this point, so I think even limiting small (32-96) is fine. Perhaps make truncation put "..." at the end or something to note that the token was truncated. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
