http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3683
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-13 13:03 ------- I can understand that you don't want a high bayes score to influence which additional emails get learned as spam, but ignoring that an email has a high bayes score and allowing it get get learned as ham is not a good idea. This means that all manual bayes learning from emails that were not caught by the non-bayes rules slowly gets undone as these emails get repeatedly marked as ham. A better rule would be to only ignore the bayes score when deciding to autolearn it as spam, but to not ignore the bayes score when deciding to autolearn something as ham. Any chance of getting this changed? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.