Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To be honest, I greatly prefer the original set, particularly > rauh-logo.png and rauh-logo2.png; the "fat" white outlines, the rounded > edges and the font are all much more to my taste...
I agree with Justin on this one. The new logo from Christian Rauh is more polished, but the original *design* was definitely better. As far as the other logos go, I think the best quality of art is the third logo, but it's definitely too sharp and harsh for our logo. We simply don't want to associate such a negative, dark, and dangerous image to our project. Let's reserve the negative image for spam! I know this is probably asking too much for free work, but I'd really like to see what an artist like Walter could do with the first two designs. Concept-wise: #1 and #2 are close to each other. #1 is more professional and very good. It is a bit too lightly colored with a lot of blank space, but I think that can be fixed with a bolder logo and thicker font. #2 is also good, but borders on being too violent as well (the newer version seems more violent than the old one). I also don't really like drawing attention to "Assassin" by making it bold. Holy mackerel, no, let's not do that! #3 is the concept I like the least, but the art is quite good. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
