http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-18 03:53 ------- Subject: Re: spamc/spamd protocol enhancement [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142 > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-28 04:12 ------- > Subject: Re: spamc/spamd protocol enhancement > > > Ok, that makes sense to me. I'm personally not opposed to this enhancement > > but > > I don't like the name of the procol "command" and the switch though: > > > > -> The command: The other alternatives to PROCESS do process the messages, > > too, though they aren't called PROCESS_FOO. And _XHDR is a bit confusing to > > me :) What about simply HEADERS? > > HEADERS - ok :) > > > > -> The switch: -X looks like an extended version of -x which does something > > completely different. Unfortunately is -H already used. > > > > I'd suggest -Y but while I thought about it, I had the idea that it could > > make > > sense to have a command TAGS, too, which just returns the tags you can use > > in > > the headers (ie. YESNO, HITS, PREVIEW etc.) in some way. For that -Y would > > make more sense and should be reserved. Maybe -Z or -z (as the successor of > > -y) could be used? > > Ok, choose -z or -Z according to your preferences :) > > > > Oh, and the ASF is the Apache Software Foundation (of which SpamAssassin is > > now part of) and CLA stands for Contributor License Agreement, see > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas > > Oh..., good trouble. :))) I submitted ASF CLA by fax. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
