http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3734
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-30 10:24 ------- Subject: Re: Why are the URIBL rules header and not body? On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:17:31AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We should just have a new type for evals that get "no" arguments (other > than perhaps the $self object and the rule name). "body" isn't right > either. Actually, for this case, we have a reserved but not used type of "URI eval", which these are, really. And it's even already handled by the body points business. ;) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
