http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3625
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-31 14:56 -------
> I'm not sure of a clean way to solve this issue though. at minimum, the
> parent sigpipe handler could see it's logging via syslog() and close/open
> appropriately.
It is doing that, apparently under Perl > 5.6.1.
It works by adding a handler to SIGPIPE that increments a value
($main::SIGPIPE_RECEIVED++). Then it runs and eval on syslog and expects that
failure to trigger the check against $main::SIGPIPE_RECEIVED++.
However, that apparently doesn't fail under 5.6.1. We added some debuggging
code under that conditional check (if ($@) {) and it never got there and child
apparently goes nuts trying to print to a now invalid file handle.
So the fix I'm proposing is to simply move that syslog processing into the
signal handler. It works in my testing.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
