Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin corrupts date headers in email...

[Craig Hughes]

Yeah, I'd seen this claim of non-compliant headers in a few places that seemed OK to me too -- The regex it's checking is pretty nasty though.  I'll see if I can figure out what jm was trying to do there and fix it.

C

On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 13:23, Daniel Pittman wrote:

Most messages that I get, these days, matches the "missing date" test,
and ends up with something like:

X-Mail-Format-Warning: Bad RFC822 header formatting in Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 14:31:08 +0000 (GMT)

Of course, that's /not/ an invalid RFC822 date, it's SpamAssassin[1]
deciding that it's not really very happy.

I also get occasional matches for, say:

X-Mail-Format-Warning: Bad RFC822 header formatting in X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Is there some way to disable this mangling of email that passes through?

I am happy with SpamAssassin adding a couple of headers, but I /really/
can't abide a system that is willing to corrupt valid data on the way
through.

        Daniel

Footnotes: 
[1]  As far as I can tell.

-- 
A man's worst difficulties begin when he is able to do as he likes.
        -- Thomas Henry Huxley

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk