Matthew Cline wrote: > On Friday 22 March 2002 12:57 am, Craig Hughes wrote: > > >>Matt, everything below sounds great. Is the stuff above definitely >>great, or worth me spending some time figuring out what you mean and >>then deciding whether or not to include it? > > > The only downside I can think of is the HTML comment removal regexp, which > uses a non-greedy regexp: > > <!--.*?--> > > I recall reading that non-greedy regexps are more compute intensive than > greedy regexps, so this might cause a perfomance hit. > > Everything else should be fine, though.
Looked good. All tests pass. Applied and checked in. Matt. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
