On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 16:02, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> > > body EYES_ONLY /(?:if you are not the addressee|privileged.{0,30}confidential)/i
> > > describe EYES_ONLY Tries to sound like you intercepted something secret (bjj)
> > > score EYES_ONLY 2
> >
> > I get a lot of perfectly innocent email that has this sort of disclaimer,
> > usually from people in the UK/Europe who are sending mail from their work
> > accounts. I've *never* seen it in spam.
>
> I get lots of email like this too -- from attorneys, accountants, etc -- and
> it's almost always extremely important and frequently time-sensitive, so I don't
> think I'll be adding that rule any time soon.
Fair enough. But two points: 1) it's not going to have a score which
would alone make that rule alone tag the mail as spam, and 2) if, as you
say, it matches mostly non-spam for you, it's not a bad test to let the
GA assign a value to.
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
