It wasn't attacks. My understanding was that the city was running unpatched version of Notes or something and the rigorous relay testing caused mail to loop within their system and they took it as an attack. Since Thursday, after they got multiple messages from sysadmins and isps, they dropped the injunction. Which makes sense considering if they didn't patch their own system. Rumor is that orbz might be back. Maybe it should be setup in Washington or Cali. I read a article on Cnet yesterday about anoter case in Washington that spammers lost.
-----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right) I thought the ORBZ author was sued due to his "attacks" on a mailserver run by the City, and not so much because his service contained blacklists? That's what I gleaned from http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/24544.html anyway. Kenneth On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Smith, Rick wrote: > > How long do you think it will be until users of SA face the same > consequences as the now infamous ORBZ case ? > > I'm sure that some lawyer out there could find a way to sue someone > for running this package. > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
