On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 08:57:32PM -0500, dman wrote: > > Why not just embedd spamc in the MTA itself? Then there's no extra > process running and the MTA just does a little more socket work > passing the message through spamd. In fact, Marc's sa-exim patch > almost does this. The only thing it doesn't do is copy-n-paste the > core of spamc because piping to it has more maintainability and thus > far has acceptable performance. It wouldn't be a bad idea to split > spamc in to a program/library pair so that others can link in the core > spamd protocol handling but provide a different interface (eg exim's > local_scan instead of stdin/stdout).
That would be idea. Being able to just add a few lines of code and link in libspamc or libspamassasin or whatever would rock. Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
