"Stewart, John" said:
> Shouldn't a spam with web bugs be a big tipoff? It's got this in the body: > <a href="http://track.offer888.net/cgi-bin/trimlife?e=2651380.17";> > But this seems to have made it *less* of a spam? problem is, this is quite a common trick used by the legit mailshot companies, so they can track message-reads etc. It shouldn't be, but it is. As a result, the GA has found so many web bugs in non-spam, that it's figured out that scoring it as a "friendly" rule gets better results overall. --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
