Adrian Hill wrote: >>Once identified, the mail can then be optionally tagged as spam for >>later filtering using the user's own mail user-agent application. > > Yeah, I suppose it does seem clear, on reflection, although I missed this > first time round, and it was previously pointed out that the most common > misconception with spamassassin was that it did sorting/filtering, rather > than solely the identification of spam. > > It's only in the third paragraph that the document mentions the phrase: > "using the user's own mail user-agent application", which is the first and > only mention that SA is *not* the program used to filter spam. Also, > "user-agent application" makes me think Outlook more than it does amavis or > mailscanner. Perhaps the wording is not precise enough?
It could do to change to also specify "Mail delivery agent" as well as user-agent. But other than that it's not far wrong. Matt. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
