I've been seeing some bounce messages and got curious... The messages
bounce because the sender is bogus of course but the original message
had this lovely header.  Would it be a good idea to have a rule to check
the To, From, and Reply-To for the same address.  


Received: (from daemon@localhost)
        by magnumforce.mr.itd.umich.edu (3.6u) with LDAP id g8I2eHn22642
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:40:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host178-51.pool8018.interbusiness.it
(host178-51.pool8018.interbusiness.it [80.18.51.178])
        by magnumforce.mr.itd.umich.edu (3.6u) with SMTP id g8I2eCq22615
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:40:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MONEY AT HOME,NO HASSLES
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from umich.edu by 9GRY0V46UQ5X4R.umich.edu with SMTP for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:44:57 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Importance: Normal
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:44:57 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now
for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664
http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to