Justin Mason wrote:
> That's exactly what is intended; the idea is that legit senders who
> habitually score just > 5, will eventually get out of "AWL hell" after
> 6-10 messages.
And how does SA distinguish 'legit senders who habitually score just
> 5' from 'spammers who habitually score just >5'?
> Note that running a single spam through "spamassassin -a -t" *will*
> eventually whitelist the spammer. but that's why the man page tells you
> not to do it ;)
I must have missed the discussion about this AWL behaviour :-/
My expectation would be, that the AWL value for a certain address/ip
combination would approach a long term average, and not move
to the negative side over time...
-a, --auto-whitelist, --whitelist
Use auto-whitelists. Auto-whitelists track the long-
term average score for each sender and then shift the
score of new messages toward that long-term average.
ciao
Klaus
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
