On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > increase in spam. Positive scores are flawed IMHO. > > I'm going to stay out of the discussion (for now at least), but I just > want to inform people that they're using incorrect terminology: > > You're talking about rules with negative scores, thereby likely to make a > message "not spam". A "positive score" or "positive rule" makes something > more likely to be spam by increasing the score.
You got me there. :) J ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
