"Smart,Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Classification: PUBLIC > If anyone is interested.... > > I run a low/medium volume (35,000/day), site-wide SA corporate installation > behind Postfix. Here's my local.cf updates that seem to have tuned things > well for me. > > BTW: I kill messages 7.0 and higher (but carboncopy headers to MBOX). I > carboncopy full messages between 5.5 and 8 into an MBOX for FP review
SA does not have many FPs, but the average score of FPs is sometimes higher than 7.0, especially with network tests turned on. I think it's much safer from to never kill messages unless the user makes that choice. Some people may not be receiving a significant amount of spam (unlike most of us) and looking through all FPs will not be a significant burden for them. The SA GA is tuned to score messages above or below the default SA threshold. Giving high scores (well above 5.0) to spam is secondary to the initial classification. If any of those RBLs are free to use and do not FP much (this would exclude the the last section of RBLs in your list), you can submit a bug with the rules and we'll look at adding them. Thanks. Dan -- Daniel Quinlan Linux, open source, and http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ anti-spam consulting ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk