On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: > I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2 > relay servers with equal MX costs sitting on the perimiter running SA, > how do you have it so they both share and update an "in-sync" db so that > both relay servers have up to date Bayes DBs? > > I remember reading that nfs wont work b/c of the flock() call, so there > must be another means no?
To my knowledge (I haven't looked at the code) the Bayes DBs use the same locking code as the AWL which is specificaly NFS safe. So, either rewrite it for SQL (and let us all know) or use NFS like we do. -- Kelsey Cummings - [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonic.net System Administrator 2260 Apollo Way 707.522.1000 (Voice) Santa Rosa, CA 95407 707.547.2199 (Fax) http://www.sonic.net/ Fingerprint = 7F 59 43 1B 44 8A 0D 57 91 08 73 73 7A 48 90 C5 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
