----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?
> > > 3rd and 4th are *always* consecutive, whether you like it or not. > > > They are not always. It often happens that mailer logs some message > > that comes between these 3rd and 4th lines of spamd. > > Possibly. I don't know what you mean by the above ;) For me, 3rd and 4th > are consecutive. There's no such thing as 3 1/2-th, 3 1/3-th etc. You're being childish, Tony. And you're not even reading properly. He never said 3rd and 4th, in the abstract, aren't consecutive. He did say, however, that the 3rd and 4th lines of "SPAMD" do not always appear consecutively in the log. Not only that, he is absolutely right, too. There is no guarantee that the 3rd and 4th line, or any other lines, of a spamd process will appear consecutively in the log. And if you ever logged something to the syslog facility yourself, you would immediately know this to be true. So, stop being a smarty-pants, ok? > But I don't know what the hell you're talking about. That much is true. > Your English is good enough for passing exams in England, > so it's not that. Could you please be a bit more specific? No. Consider it an IQ threshold. If you're too daft to understand what he is saying, then you should simply not respond; let alone dispense sarcastic wise-cracks on language. P.S. Hmmm, I remember an earlier altercation with you. I do not think I liked you much then, either. I consider this a reminder why. - Mark ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
