Analyzing my spam from the last 3 months, I have had zero in my Inbox with RCVD_IN_SBL while about 50% in my SPAM box has RCVD_IN_SBL.
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/ >From my own experience above and their own description on this site, it sounds like the SBL is fairly safe and not abusive like other DNSBL's in the past have been accused of. Would anyone else agree that the SBL is generally safe to add to your MTA's rejection list? I am soon launching a 1500+ user mail server with spamassassin, so I am thinking that if I can cut out 50% of the spam, then I can save a lot of CPU and disk resources and run more efficiently, if everything from the SBL is indeed spam. If the SBL is generally safe to use for MTA-level rejection, are any of the other DNSBL's safe to use in this way too? Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
