Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any reason for this, or are we to use custom rules for that?
It was changed because the old test needed improvement, not on a whim. Old HTML_WEB_BUGS rule wasn't a very good discriminator between HTML spam and HTML ham. In other words, it had about the same S/O ratio as a generic test for HTML. The new rule has a significantly higher S/O ratio, although it doesn't hit as much spam since it's more specific. The new rule requires that height and width be specified and that /\.(?:pl|cgi|php|asp|jsp|cfm)\b/i match the SRC attribute. (S/O = spam/overall) Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, and open http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ source consulting (looking for new work) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
