Matt Kettler said:
> As for disabling the network checks for auto-learning, that makes sense to
> me as well, since the bayes code learns from text tokens, not IPs.
Actually, not quite right, if you're scanning with network tests, it'll
do the auto-learn score test with network tests as well.
But regarding the use of Bayes in auto-learn determination causing
feedback, that's the big danger.
BTW, one possible way to avoid FP/FNs getting into the auto-learn data
further, is to modify the learn() sub to add to the existing verification
steps:
- recomputed hits must be < bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam or
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam
- for spam, must have 3 head hits and 3 body hits
add this one:
- previous hits must be < bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam or
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam
that would mean both the existing main score and the recomputed score
must agree that the mail is spam or ham.
comments?
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
