Hello Matt, Monday, June 23, 2003, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MK> At 01:41 PM 6/23/03 +0400, Maxim Berlin wrote: >>so, i've -98.1 hits, and no X-Spam-Flag: YES, but subject was >>rewritten. Is that a bug, or i do not understand something? MK> This kind of general behavior usually happens when a message gets run MK> through SA twice. The first run tags it, but the second one dones not and MK> re-writes the spam status and spam flag headers making it appear to not be MK> tagged. Thanks for answer, but i am still confused. Two passes: sendmail input(1)->majordomo->sendmail output(2), am i correct? (1) should not tag message, because sender is in whitelist_from. and, anyway, score is: hits=-98.1, so SA gets only 1.9 hit. why rewriting subject? Both recipient and sender is USER_IN_WHITELIST. Message should never be tagged, or? Best wishes, Maxim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
