From: "Simon Byrnand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi ML, > > > > I've set auto_learn_threshold_spam to 14.0. > > My Q. is, when I got a Spam e.g. from @valodata.com > > it gets about 10.0, then auto_learn will not learn from this, > > so I set the domain to manual blacklist that it gets +100. > > Will then SA learn from this Spam ? I think so, but I'd > > like to hear a "definitely yes" :-) > > THX > > No it won't. > > Manual blacklist/whitelist entries and Bayes scores don't contribute > towards triggering the autolearn threshold.
hmmmm .. my problem is that I use SA on a relayer and don't want to feed SA manually with sa-learn. But with only auto_learn enabled I catch plenty of Spam and not much Ham. Should I set the auto_learn value for nonspam to "0" rather than "-2" ? THX
Since 2.54 auto_learn_threshold_ham of -2 is probably too negative to learn much ham. I tried 0 for a while and it worked ok but I found, for me, it was learning a lot more ham than spam so I dropped it to -1. YMMV
Regards, Simon
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
