Hey Vicki, > Do I simply set auto_whitelist_factor 0? Does that turn off > AWL checking? Is there a "better" solution?
You might want to read the FAQ below. It does not specifically answer your question but may help. http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq01.013.htp If you want to turn AWL off, remove the -a option from spamassassin init script or however you call it. Reference: http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq01.013.htp >From a subsequent post: > I am looking for a SA solution. "Solutions" (aka workaroounds) in > procmail/exim/sendmail/etc will be politely ignored. I can create > workarounds for myself. Please don't send them. This is a Spam > Assassin problem! You did originally ask for a "better" solution so I will just say the following. If you do not find a reasonable solution, you should keep in mind that some external check might benefit you. If you can check, via your MTA or other like Procmail, that some combination of the header from, envelope from, and/or Received lines do not contain the proper information then blacklist or reject the message. AWL is a nice feature and if this is the only problem, you might want to use a workaround rather than dumping AWL because of one specific case. Just a thought. --Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
