On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> In theory you should feed your bayes engine a fairly balanced > diet of spam and nonspam, without consideration of wether or > not SA caught it. I send anything scoring 10 or greater directly to /dev/null, so these highly spammy messages are not included in my spam corpus. Would my Bayes engine do better if they *were* included? Ted -- Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bloomington, IN, USA ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
