I was merrily using SpamAssassin (directly, ver 2.55, on Linux).
But the recent virus emails flooded my mailbox, and SpamAssassin tagged most of them as good.
I then installed SpamProbe, and within just 100 messages, it got nearly all of the 50-100 emails I get (mostly spam) tagged correctly..
So now in my .procmailrc, I use both spamassassin and spamprobe - if either of them tags the message as spam, I move it to a bulk folder.
This is working really well!
The point of this message - I thought SpamAssassin included a Bayesian filter, and I am not sure if it is kicking in for me (I understand it needs to learn 1500 email messages?) Also: SpamProbe uses word pairs, etc, don't know if that or other features make it work better right now...
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
