I think that would be a bad idea. I jacked up the MS executable test to +110 to make sure if some one was dumb enough to send an MS executable, but was white listed, that the mail would still get tagged. Maybe as an option it would be nice for some, such as
HALT_ON_WHITELISTED 1 or something similar. -----Original Message----- From: Louis LeBlanc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:44 AM To: SpamAssassin Talk Subject: [SAtalk] question/idea for whitelisted sender handling Hey all. With all the noise about Osirusoft, my mail server is practically on its knees. I actually had to shut off network tests for a few minutes to recover. Anyway, thinking about this gave me an idea. I know that when SA finds a message in the whitelist, it pretty much guarantees the message will get to its destination without being tagged as spam, but it still performs all the network tests. Wouldn't it be nice if one could turn off network tests for whitelisted senders? I'm sure someone else will have one or more of the following: ideas how to refine or improve this idea . . . reasons why it is a bad idea . . . how to do it in SA 2.55 . . . I'm interested in any and all discussion relevant to the above . Thanks all. Lou --=20 Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org =D4=BF=D4=AC ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
