I think RC3 contains some tests which do no good. Here is what I just got in:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_44,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT autolearn=no version=2.60-rc3 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 BAYES_44 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 44 to 50% * [score: 0.4531] * 3.0 MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT Message-Id was added by a relay * 0.9 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers * 2.2 MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 'Content-Type' found without required MIME headers MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT the message-id was NOT added by a relay, it was added by the original sending server because it was directly injected to sendmail from a Perl formmailer. Most formmailers don't add a message-id but let it do the mail server they run on (We already discussed this loosely here during the last weeks.). That's absolutely fine, I think. 3 score points for this? FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD Sure does the From: yahoo.com not match the Received header, it didn't go via yahoo servers. This is perfectly ok, why 0.9 score points for this? MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY The message didn't contain any Content-Type header! However, it's possible that the milter added one and then handed it over with the header included to spamd. I've got to investigate this further. So, this may not be the fault of SA. But what about the other two? Shall I submit any of this to Bugzilla? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
