If there's no BAYES_ test whatsoever, it isn't thinking it's ham. It's not saying anything whatsoever. Probably based upon the fact that it didn't have sufficient tokens or something.
Please note that Bayes doesn't use keywords. It uses tokens, which may or may not resemble words. Also note that this email has very unusual spacing between words, and does funny things with the placement of punctuation. It probably confused Bayes. You'll want to learn it. For some reason I didn't see the spam header report on this email, so this is all pure conjecture. -tom > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlo Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 8:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] No BAYES_* ? > > > The attached mail got through spam-assassin without a problem... > Why? Where is the BAYES_* test? > Does this mean that the bayes engine thinks this is less than 10% > chance to be spam? That would be ridiculous! > How can I test on which keywords it is basing that this ham? > > -- > Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
