Yes. It appears my 2.60 rules are in /opt/perl/share/spamassassin/ and that /usr/share/spamassassin has an old ruleset in it. I could make links from /usr/share/spamassassin, but is there another way? That strikes me as a short term solution.

On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 11:46 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:

At 08:40 AM 9/11/2003 -0600, Ken Gordon wrote:

I just noticed the following in a spamassassin report. I thought 2.60 (which I think I am running) didn't use this test. Am I wrong? Should I be zeroing it in local.cf?

RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.9 points) RBL: Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
[RBL check: found 31.43.45.68.relays.osirusoft.com.]


spamassassin -V gives
SpamAssassin version 2.60-rc3

You clearly aren't running the ruleset 2.60-rc3 if you are getting OSIRUSOFT messages.. just grep the rules subdir of the SA tarball for "OSIRU" and you'll find no matches at all.


[Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60]$ grep -i "OSIRU" rules/*
[Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60]$

And yes, that's the right spot to grep:

[Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60]$ grep -i "RCVD_IN" rules/* |wc -l
    292



Ken Gordon (780) 910-7652



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to