>>>>> "CW" == Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CW> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:46:18PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> They need to follow the PAL/GPL. A "commercial" version is perfectly >> fine, assuming they've made changes such that we're a component. CW> They still have to provide the source code along with CW> their binary distribution. If they don't, we should CW> tell the FSF about it. Why? Do they own the copyrights to SA? If not, then there's not much they can do about it. It is pretty obvious a lot of people assume things about the SA licence but haven't actually read it or tried to understand it... Same goes for a lot of Open Source projects, it seems. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
