2 questions: 1) why is SA not using my custom rule in my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file?
2) Why was Bayes not run on this message? Information: The ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs contains: bayes_ignore_header X-PerlMx-Spam header LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_90 /X-PerlMX=~ /\b Probability=9[0-9]\%/ score LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_90 3 header LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_80 /X-PerlMX=~ /\b Probability=8[0-9]\%/ score LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_80 2 header LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_70 /X-PerlMX=~ /\b Probability=7[0-9]\%/ score LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_70 1 The /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file contains: use_bayes 1 SA is called from the /etc/procmailrc which is: DROPPRIVS=yes :0fw | /usr/bin/spamc The header of the message that slipped through this morning had: X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, ... X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs (1.195-2003-06-30-exp) on cornerstone.tamu.edu X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_GREEN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS, RCVD_IN_SBL,WHILE_SUPPLIES autolearn=no version=2.60-cvs an sa-learn --dump shows: 0.000 0 1658 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 495 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 91398 0 non-token data: ntokens -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes Computer Systems Manager ph: 979-845-7801 Department of Physics fax: 979-845-2590 Texas A&M University ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
