As far as I have seen, no one has written any rules as of yet. Currently They score a 5.9 for me. I have a good collection of the viri, but no time today to write the rules :(
The headers differ by a lot. Not one solid tag to tie between them all. > -----Original Message----- > From: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:58 PM > To: 'Chris Santerre' > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files > > > Chris, > > Are there any custom rules to deal with the massive amount of > fake security > warnings claiming to be from Microsoft? > > > Regards, > > > John Schneider > Information Systems Manager, > DAUM Commercial Real Estate Services > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:51 AM > To: 'John Schneider'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:03 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] spamd vs spamassassin from .forward files > > > > > > Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list > > archives. But, if > > it is, I didn't find it: > > > > My config is sendmail and procmail with SA 2.55 on FreeBSD Unix. > > > > I am currently running SpamAssassin through procmail for > > individual users. > > > > Their .forward files have the command: > > "|exec /usr/local/bin/procmail || exit 75" > > > > Their .procmailrc files have the command: > > :0fw: spamassassin.lock > > * < 256000 > > | spamassassin > > > > I have no .forward files. All procmail scripts. Actually I > only have 2 users > on the system. Root and a spamassassin user. All of the users > are aliases to > individual procmail scripts. Gives me the flexability to customise > procmails. But I have to use global rules and scores. > > > This seems to work OK, but I'm not sure it is an efficient > > setup. Right now > > I have 20-30 users on SpamAssassin this way in a corporate > > environment. > > Soon, I'll have more (eventually up to about 180 max). Should > > I be using > > spamd? And, if so, do I start that the same way in the > > procmailrc file? I > > tried to setup procmail as the default MTA, but I am not sure > > I have all the > > debug yet, so I am still using the indivial .forward and > > .procmailrc files. > > > > Also, I have SpamAssassin 2.55. I see a lot more spam has > > found it's way > > through the last week or so. Is there an evolving set of > > rules that deal > > with this that I should be updating? If so, where do I find > > it, or do I just > > update SA when the next release comes out? > > > > spammers have been tricking out 2.55 for some time now. They > will likely do > the same with 2.60 (or at least try!) Custom rules can be > found in the link > in my sig. > > > > Last question, can I send a user's /var/mail/username file > > through procmail > > and spamassassin once it is already created (for exmaple for > > a user that > > wasn't using the .forward file and SpamAssassin before that I > > want to filter > > on an impromtu-basis)? > > > > If I follow you correctly, yeah, just make the procmail files > and SA dirs. > > > Thanks for the help! I really appreciate all the efforts of all you > > tech-studs! > > > > --- John > > > > Chris Santerre > System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper > http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm > "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest > men." - Willy > Wonka > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
