Quoting Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 11:32:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by fbsd.cykotix.com by uid 82
> with
> > qmail-scanner-1.20rc3 
> >  (clamuko: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.60.  Clear:RC:0:SA:1(12.7/8.0):. 
> >  Processed in 4.526443 secs); 28 Sep 2003 23:43:37 -0000
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.7 required=8.0
> 
> ah, you're running qmail-scanner.  all bets are off since it does its own
> thing.
> 
> -- 
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "By golly, I'm beginning to think Linux really *is* the best thing since
>  sliced bread."
>  (By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)
> 


no, that shouldn't matter.  There is nothing special with how it calls spamd. 
Thats like saying all bets are off if you use maildrop or procmail to call spamd.

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to