On Friday 10 October 2003 07:32, Martin Schroeder wrote: > On 2003-10-10 07:14:56 -0700, Jeff Lasman wrote: > > And one more thing... though I don't see it mentioned, I'm > > presuming from the sa-learn manpage that I don't have to remove the > > already existing SpamAssassin headers from either the spam or the > > ham; that sa-learn will ignore them. Is that correct? > > Yes. RTFAQ
Thanks, Martin. I didn't find it in the FAQ the first time I read it; I'll take time to study it more carefully. I'm still not sure if I should run through "ham" as well as "spam" or not. Is there a specific answer for this? Thanks. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation Our blists address used on lists is for list email only Phone +1 909 324-9706, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"; ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
