-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Wagner
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] Catching Lots of Remarks in HTML Messages

We seem to be getting more messages like:
G<!-- bereave -->I<!-- catechism -->RL<!-- increment -->S T<!--
firestone
-->HA<!-- arrowhead -->T RE<!-- nowaday -->....

I was curious if Spamassassin would catch these with a rule like:

body LOTS_REMARKS                       /\b<!-- /w+ -->\b/i
describe LOTS_REMARKS                   HTML Lots of Remarks <!-- ###
-->

The other question is-> Are the rules additive?  Such that it would
score a
point for each remark.  So I can put the score low, and after 10 remarks
it
would pass the limit.

score LOTS_REMARKS                   .5
_________________________________________

These are "additive" if you don't like to crank up the scores on single
rules and prefer lots of smaller hits to bump spam up.  Sorry, I posted
them in a new thread and you might have missed them.    

http://spamhammers.nxtek.net/ 

Jennifer
(chris has me all worried now about top and bottom posting!)

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to