On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 08:58, Matt Kettler wrote: > Yes, but it's also a security risk to run spamd/spamc both always as root, > which is why SA is falling back to "nobody" in the first place. > > Certainly the better solution is to specify a non-root user with the -u > parameter, however, baring that, SA will by default fall back to > least-privilege. I agree with that... Unfortunately (see my other message to the list), I get errors in syslog when I run using -u root. For some reason it doesn't seem to be able to communicate with spamd once I change that parameter...
Thanks! -- David A. Bartmess Software Configuration Manager / Sr. Software Developer eDingo Enterprises http://edingo.net ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
