* Tom Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031108 08:52]: > > -----Original Message----- > > > > IIRC, bl.spamcop.net isn't supposed to resolve. Try running an RBL > > > query against it instead of trying to resolve it. > > > > > > > > Surely it has to resolve to *something* - the NS records have > > gone as well. > > > > Tony > > > No, it doesn't have to. When you query against bl.spamcop.net, you take > the connecting server's IP address, reverse it, and query for that > record. If it answers 127.0.0.2 it's listed, if it errors out, it's > not. > > i.e. 1.2.3.4 connects, your server queries DNS for > 4.3.2.1.bl.spamcop.net. 127.0.0.2 > > It's never necessary to simply query for bl.spamcop.net itself.
Correct. The test address works, too: > nslookup 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net. Server: Loopback.KJSL.COM Address: 127.0.0.1 Name: 2.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net Address: 127.0.0.2 -jav ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
