Definitely FPs. I think SA has a very difficult time with solicited commercial email, even with Bayes feeding. I had to up my site-wide installation to 10.0 to get only the worst of the worst and to stop people's solicited Princeline / Day's Inn, etc. hotel confirmations and travel/real estate deals lists from getting tagged.
And it doesn't help that Razor, DCC and Pyzor have a lot of users that report legitimate solicited commercial email as spam (the people that forget to uncheck "send me great offers" when they order a product from a vendor, and then report those vendors' "great offers" as spam). Maybe it's better to not use Bayes at all on a site-wide basis. I've noticed Columbia University doesn't use Bayes... Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Gilson Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] scoring system and values... I don't know if this really fits in this subject or not. However, I keep thinking while reading this thread if anyone considers real opt-in advertisements/messages that get tagged by SA (like from OshKosh, Travelocity, Lands' End, etc.) to be a FP or not. Do site-wide Bayes installs have a hard time differentiating without feeding? Thanks, Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
