> It did however use a trick to avoid the standard > FROM_AND_TO_SAME so your > rule can help out by adding some score.. However, 104.1 is a > bit excessive, > since there's no white list to over-ride. (Bret is smart and did not > whitelist_from himself).
No whitelist of myself necessary here as trusted/authenticated e-mail isn't scanned by SA. > Really, my suggestion to Bret would be to train his bayes on this... > BAYES_60 is pretty weak. And I do, always on spam that gets by. I'm just concerned that with an obfuscation technique like this, training might not really increase the hit level enough. If it gets commonplace enough, I guess Jennifer might drop in another rule like the popcorn/weeds/backhair rules, which are very effective at identifying most obfuscation. Bret ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
