On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> The reason I mention it - aside from being pleased - is to point out
> that it appears the problem was either the old spambouncer headers, or
> forgetting, wasn't (the latter being what I started out suspecting,
> until I discovered the spambouncer headers). Another imperfection in my
> experience analysis is that I suppose the database could have been
> corrupted, as I'd gotten knocked off line several times while running
> sa-learn.
Assuming that the spambouncer headers are unique to your site you
can put them in "bayes_ignore_header" lines in your "local.cf"
and not worry about them.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
