> We just replaced our old qmail-scanner + spamd system with a fresh
install,
> and we had a concurrency incoming of about 150.  The old single processor
> PIII 800 handled this just fine.
>
> The new dual PIII 1Ghz would supposedly work much better.  With
> qmail-scanner 1.20 and spamd 2.60 it managed to run out of memory and
lockup
> the machine.
>
> I set use_bayes and use_pyzor to 0 because I'm not too sure how to set
that
> up properly with qmail-scanner.
>
> Is there a known problem with spamd 2.60 that is causing it to consume
100%
> of the processor?
>
> We process as many as 8000 to 10000 messages per hour.

My guess would be bad RAM. Just a guess, but with a *new* box that's
supposed to be beefier, it seems logical.

Mike Jackson
Technical Manager, efn.org
www.efn.org




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to