On December 01, 2003 12:08 am, Aaron Young wrote: > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Pedro Sam wrote: > > > > Can anyone else confirm that "spamassassin -r" fails to remove SA markup > > when it invokes bayes learning? > > > How are you passing the message to spamassassin -r?
My messages are in mbox format, so I report/learn spam by: "formail -s spamassassin -r < SPAM_MBOX" But when I dump the contents of the bayes database, I found many tokens unique to SA headers and markup. I have experimented with using sa-learn instead, and it seems sa-learn does indeed strip out SA markup properly. As a compromise, I now proprocessing spam with an explicit "spamassassin -d", before I pass it to "spamassassin -r". I'm just wondering if anyone else is experienceing this, and maybe file a bug report. Pedro > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Only God can make random selections. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
