Hello all,
I've been using SA for some months now with great success. Its rule
scheme is very efficient and straight-forward when you learn some
regexp.
But, as an end-user (I sys-admin some thousands of mail accounts), I
think that the rules could be forked from SA, so community could treat
SA as a spam-scanning engine and the rules would be the spam database,
like an anti-virus package. This would allow a more often update of the
rules without the need to upgrade SA.
I understand that some rules depends on features/functions inside SA,
but such a proposed scheme would allow a more often update of the rules
for each (?) new spam.
So,
SA Version N
- Rules N.1 released on 01/01/2004
- Rules N.2 released on 22/01/2004
- Rules N.3 released ...
SA version N+1
- Rules N+1.1 released on 12/05/2004
- Rules N+1.2 released on 02/06/2004
- Rules N+1.3 released ...
(...)
So, Rules N+1.X won't work on SA version < N+1.
The main purpose is to have a more often rules update without the need
to dig on mailling lists or the whole web for a rule set for a specific
new spam.
Just a brainstorm, hope to hear what you think. And sorry if this has
been discussed before.
Best Regards,
--
--
Marcio Merlone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ UIN #13746928 - Linux user #104911
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
