On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:18:54 -0500 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:13 AM 12/15/2003, you wrote: > >On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:25:38 -0500 > >Terry Milnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) > > > > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (...) > as a further off-list clarification.. if you need to whitelist multiple > addresses, use multiple whitelist_to statements with one address per line. > > ie: > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > BEWARE of this option however.. if someone sends a spam that as a To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], and BCC's it to a bunch of your users, the whitelist > will take affect for _all_ recipients of the message. Thanks for you readiness. Back on-list, wouldn't be useful to make a rule to white-list a message when sent to abuse@, but only when it has no BCC or tons of rcpts? So, our abuse@ team could receive spam complains and still not become some kind of open relay... How do you like it? -- -- Marcio Merlone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ UIN #13746928 - Linux user #104911 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
