Hi! On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:30:57PM -0600, Chris Thielen wrote: > Chris Santerre said: > > > I was wondering if possibly in the future, SA could check the URI > > links against RBLs? They all seem to be using the same servers to host now > > after they are blacklisted. This way they still get use out of the hosted > > boxes. Just a thought. > > A while back there was a patch posted to SA-Talk that did just that for > Debian's SpamAssassin 2.60 package. I was running it until I upgraded to > SA 2.61. It worked quite well although the scores that were included with > the patch were pretty aggressive.
I made them a bit aggressive for testing and adjusted them from time to time. That is, for "extreme-blackhat" ISPs like Chinanet as well as SBL-listed hosts I kept the scores between 3 and 4, but I scored down "darkhat" ISPs like Verio. > Based on my personal results, I think this would be worthwhile merging > into the official SA distribution. I wonder if Florian would be willing > to submit a bug report to bugzilla with his patch against 2.70 CVS Within the next few days I'll need a new patch against 2.60 (on Debian Sarge) anyway and I can submit it of course. ;-) Yet it is still very useful to run a DNS server on the same machine, as the number of DNS queries per email is a bit less than after the initial patch but still very high. /. DocSnyder. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
